Saturday, 19 September 2015

1884-09-12 Runaway Horses - Danger and Damage

Runaway horses were not uncommon in Hamilton’s streets in 1884. While maybe not daily occurrences, they were frequent enough that they were reported in the newspapers only if something exceptional happened or if injuries resulted.
Such was the case with the runaway which happened on September 12, 1884.
Following is the Hamilton Times’ account of the incident:
“Between 11:30 and 12 o’clock this morning, a team belonging to Mr. Case, of Mount Hope, broke away from the Dominion Hotel stables and rushed out of the yard before those standing near realized what was wrong.
“They turned up Charles street, and when they arrived at Mr. Wm. Hendrie’s residence, they were obliged to make another turn. They veered to the west, and then at Park street turned again and continued their mad career down to King.
“After striking against a wagon belonging to Reid’s furniture store, and tearing the shafts therefrom, a man tried to stop them, but the effort only drove them into the Franklin House. The waggon attached to them struck against the two first tie posts and tore them down, but at the third, the vehicle stuck.
“The freed horses started again, and when opposite Grove’s blacksmith shop, knocked down an elderly lady named Mrs. Belford, of 15 Gore street. She was picked up by Mr. Groves and taken into Kavanaugh’s grocery where her injuries were attended to by Dr. Stark. The surgeon found that her arm was broken near the shoulder and that she was otherwise injured by her fall. She was taken to the hospital.
“During the time that the frightened team were going down Park street, many spectators held their breath at the imminent peril the crowds of school children were in, and it is miraculous that none of them were injured.
“Upon inquiry it was learned that no particular event triggered the team in their stall, but it is surmised that being annoyed by flies one of the horses got entangled in his harness and, in his efforts to relieve himself, knocked the sides of the stall down, and that they became frightened at the slattering of the fallen boards. “1
1     “A Runaway Team : Run Down an Old Lady and Break Her Arm.”
Hamilton Times.  September 12, 1884.

1 comment:


    Those who believe men are saved without being immersed in water teach that men have their sins forgiven the very minute they believe in Jesus Christ. The writer of thirteen new testament books had his sins forgiven three days after he believed in Jesus. Yes, Saul (later to be called apostle Paul) believed in Jesus on the road to Damascus, however, his sins were forgiven three days later in Damascus when he was baptized in water.Acts (9:1-18, Acts 22:1-16)

    1. Saul believes Jesus is Lord. Acts 9:4-5 ...Saul, Saul why are you persecuting Me?" 5 And he said, "Who are You, Lord?' And the Lord said, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. It is hard for you to kick against the goads."(NKJV)

    2. Saul repented. Acts 9:6 So he, trembling and astonished, said, "Lord, what do You want me to do?" And the Lord said to him, "Arise and go to the city, and you will be told what to do."(NKJV)

    3. Saul is in Damascus three days later. Acts 9:8-9 ...and brought him to Damascus. 9 And he was three days without sight, neither ate nor drank.(NKJV)

    4. Saul's sin were washed away three days after being confronted by Jesus on the road to Damascus. Acts 22:16 'And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord."

    Saul became a believer on the road to Damascus, however, his sins were not forgiven until he was baptized in water, calling on the name of the Lord.

    Saul (the apostle Paul) was not saved the minute he believed on the road to Damascus. Saul was still in his sins until he was baptized three days later in Damascus, by Ananias.

    Mark 16:16 "He who believes and is baptized will be saved...(NKJV)

    Jesus was correct was He spoke in Mark 16:16 and was correct when He spoke in Acts 9 and Acts 22.

    Forgiveness follows belief and baptism. Men rejecting water baptism as being essential for salvation does not invalidate the words of Jesus Christ.