Saturday 4 March 2017

1886 - Controversial Performance at the Grand


The name of the upcoming performance was certainly titillating and it was noticed, not by potential paying customers to the show at the Grand Opera house, but also by many of those leading various churches in Hamilton who made their concerns known to the proper authorities.

As reported in the Hamilton Spectator:

“Several city clergymen requested the chief of police to prevent the performance of an Adamless Eden last night in the Grand Opera House. The chief did not stop it, but he was there in uniform and a proscenium box, ready to interfere if anything were said, sung or done that would cause the blush of shame to suffuse the cheeks of the modest occupants of the front row.”1

1“Music and the Drama : Information Concerning Singers and Players : Music, Mirth and Undraped Limbs.”

Hamilton Spectator.   May 15, 1886.

The Spectator reporter, present at the Grand Opera House to review The Adamless Eden, was withering in his comments:

“The house was about half full of men; there was only one female in front of the footlight – an elderly lady who stoically sat out the whole performance. It was not a good show. The company was not nearly as good the one which produced burlesque here last season.

“There were some score of women in it, including the orchestra which, by the way, was an inexecrable one. The burlesque has been cut down and altered to suit the company, and every vestige of artistic coherence, if ever it had any, has disappeared from it. As presented by the company, it is simply without any cleverness to sugarcoat its inherent vulgarity. Nothing openly indecent was uttered last night, but the prurient portion of the audience was not disappointed, for there were many covert remarks and gestures which made men giggle and poke one another’s ribs in ecstasy.

“The costumes looked as if they had seen long service, and so did the wearer. Actually, big Marie Sanger looked young and charming among this company of archaic and uncomely chestnuts of the burlesque stage. The spectators, however, satisfied, because there was plenty of lower limb on view, and each anatomical extremity was as sprightly and expressive as possible.1

No comments:

Post a Comment